| donovan | question: how can i increse browsing site when im using tor ? |
| donovan | anyone ? , thanx |
| donovan | ..incresing browsing speed at maximum |
| darrob | donovan: consider using polipo and/or squid. maybe even a dns caching proxy though i haven't looked into that myself. |
| frodo | Just started using Tor. I'm in the US. When I go to www.google.com I get the russian page www.google.ru. Is this normal when using Tor? I guess this is because google is getting a Russia IP address from the last server that my request went through? |
| darrob | frodo: correct |
| murb | frodo: go to http://www.google.com/ncr |
| frodo | Thanks guys. I tried http://www.google.com/ncr and that brought up the English page. |
| dr|z3d | frodo: add your own language search via mycroft, or specify google.us or google.co.nz. or google.co.uk for English results. |
| dr|z3d | http://mycroft.mozdev.org .. you might also consider adding https://ssl.scroogle.org to your Firefox quicksearch bar, assuming you're using Firefox.. |
| frodo | dr|z3d: Good ideas. Thanks. |
| dr|z3d | frodo: No worries. Also you might like to browse to about:config in Firefox, filter for keyword, and then amend the url you'll see there. |
| frodo | Another question... With Tor your http requests gets bounced around to different To servers to make who is the origial sender. I see from the Tor site that anyone can sign up to be a Tor server. Does this not mean that someone with bad intentions could sign up to be a Tor server, capture all of the packets I am sending and then extract personal information from them? For instance if I'm doing on-line banking of shopping. I guess in those |
| frodo | case the packets would be encrypted but what about when the packets are not encyrpted. Am I right about this or am I missing somehting? |
| katmagic | You're absolutely right. |
| dr|z3d | frodo: Exactly right. |
| katmagic | That's an inherent flaw in the Tor design. |
| dr|z3d | The exit server is the weakest link. |
| katmagic | Or in the design of the Internet in general, actually. |
| dr|z3d | For best results, ensure all traffic that passes over Tor is encrypted. |
| katmagic | Your ISP can do that to you when you're not using Tor. |
| katmagic | Or any of the servers in between. |
| katmagic | Try running a traceroute. It's scary. |
| rudi_s | frodo: And make sure you verify SSL certificates to prevent Man-In-The-Middle attacks. |
| katmagic | https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/6415 |
| katmagic | ^ That's a pretty cool add-on. |
| phobos | cert patrol is neat |
| phobos | petname used to do something similar |
| phobos | but then stopped tracking changes to certs |
| katmagic | I wish there was an option to disable the pop-ups the first time you see a site, though. |
| mikeperry | does cert patrol do anything other than be annoying? |
| mikeperry | I've been running it for a while |
| mikeperry | I still don't understand what it actually does |
| mikeperry | other than make me click OK sometimes to a big bunch of text |
| phobos | it simply records the cert fingerprint |
| phobos | so you can get a warning if the cert doesn't match in the future |
| phobos | otherwise, no, it does nothing else |
| mikeperry | does it ever tell you if it has actually changed? or is it still the same big bunch of text? |
| mikeperry | or perhaps a very similar big bunch of text that I've already clicked OK to after being owned without realizing it :) |
| katmagic | It tells you if a certificate's changed. |
| katmagic | The big bunch of text at the beginning is the annoying first show. |
| mikeperry | tell me the warning looks significantly differnet |
| katmagic | I've never had a certificate change, though, so I don't know what happens. |
| mikeperry | if its a also a big grey window, its a pretty useless addon |
| mikeperry | way too much warning fatigue |
| phobos | this is why i remove all CAs |
| mikeperry | no preferences for it either |
| katmagic | Yeah, that's really annoying. |
| phobos | nope |
| mikeperry | yep, the warning looks almost exactly the same as the new cert window, which you can't seem to disable |
|
|
| phobos | and you can't see what it has stored |
| katmagic | Really? That's vexing. |
| phobos | nor can you stop it from saving a cert |
| mikeperry | when is this certlock thingy coming out? |
| mikeperry | that sounds like it could actually be useful |
| phobos | and i'd like it so say "this same cert was used on domains x, y, z" |
| mikeperry | or is it just a reasearch paper, and forever so it will remain just to pad someone's CV |
| phobos | i wonder if you could enumerate this domains cert patrol has saved and get a browsing history |
| phobos | s/this/the/ |
| phobos | i'm sure it's in someone's CV for a good decade |
| mikeperry | you can do that with normal SSL certs |
| mikeperry | there actually is some torbutton code written to try to isolate the SSL cert stores between tor states. but the firefox apis for interacting with the cert store are super buggy and prone to crash bugs |
| phobos | sweet |
| mikeperry | and other weirdness with client certs |
| phobos | fail, extremely, and brittle |
| mikeperry | I should reinvestigate them in a recent FF release |
| katmagic | I suppose I'm going to uninstall CertPatrol, then. |
| phobos | i worry about the enumeration attack for not using CAs too |
| katmagic | Someone should become a Tor liaison to Firefox. |
| phobos | i'm sure i have a unique set of certs saved |
| phobos | which would leave a fine fingerprint |
| phobos | we have two people who know firefox people well |
| phobos | it's firefox that doesn't seem to care so much |
| phobos | or, doesn't prioritize what we do |
| mikeperry | hrmm Soghoian did certlock. he is pretty good at releasing code, at least. maybe he's just busy.. |
| phobos | clearly we need to just exploit ff, do a defcon/blackhat talk, and then wait for the fix |
| phobos | i'm sure he's busy taking on the entire ad industry |
| phobos | abusing his ftc powers |
| phobos | "have a taco, punks" |
| nsa | or: phobos committed revision 22170 (/torbrowser/trunk): update tbb todo to current state. |
| Hamra | greetings everyone. my tor setup is set to intercept packets transparently. is there anyway i can filter out torrent data out? |
| Sebastian | your firewall might have a way to filter data by application |
| Hamra | the most plausible idea was using --cmd-owner in iptables to filter ktorrent packets, but alas, ubuntu doesn't support it |
| katmagic | You could use a different user account for torrenting. |
| Hamra | yeah, i thought of that. iptables becomes a piece of cake, but will mean chowning soe directories, and an edit to sudoers to avoid having to type a password everytime. i think this would be the simplest way so far |
| Hamra | torrent is all TCP, right? |
| katmagic | Use gksudo. |
| katmagic | (if you're having X problems.) |
| katmagic | Some torrents use UDP. |
| dr|z3d | Torrent is mostly TCP, but there is some UDP support as well. |
| katmagic | Especially for trackers. |
| Action: dr|z3d stops being an echo and leaves katmagic to it. |
| katmagic | They sometimes have udp:// URLs. |
| katmagic | lol |
| Hamra | as long as it has an http tracker this shouldn'r be a problem, almost all do. |
| katmagic | But you want the torrents to _not_ go over Tor, right? |
| Hamra | yeah |
| Hamra | everything goes through tor now, i want torrent data to go directly, with the exception of the tracker bit, which can be easily configured in ktorrent's settings itself |
| katmagic | Yes. So the answer is to run it as a different user. |
| katmagic | I do not believe you can filter traffic by the process's binary's location. I might be wrong, though. |
| Hamra | there is a parameter called --cmd-owner for ptables, but it needs to be compiled in the kernel. it was removed from mainstream kernel a while ago, and most distros dont use it anymore |
| katmagic | Well, cool. |
| katmagic | Then start using Gentoo, I guess. |
| Hamra | lol, nah |
| Hamra | my peers disappeared from the tor network map, and i can see them in iftop, everything working fine :D |
| dr|z3d | Vidalia's just not managed to connect to Tor properly, then.. |
| dr|z3d | Maybe Tor's running as a service? |
| Hamra | no no, that's the intended response. i *want* them to disappear from the network map, i dont want my torrents running through tor |
| katmagic | I think Hamra means the BitTorrent peers. |
| dr|z3d | Ah, my bad. As you were. |
| Hamra | and my tor is running in a chroot jail. vidalia cant start it, but if set to not try and start tor, it can connect it, but cant modify its settings. vidalia should include an option for blindly connecting to tor, without access to its files |
| Hamra | ktor can do it, but IMHO it's not as useful and friendly as vidalia |
| dr|z3d | Is that distinct from TorK? |
| Hamra | oops, i meant torK :P not sure why ktor came to my mind |
| dr|z3d | Ah, thought you might have meant TorK :) Well, for some things, I find TorK actually streets ahead of Vidalia.. connection monitoring, automatic application proxying to name but two. |
| figaro | anyone have a URL (non tor) list somewhere on the internet of IRC based networks, and or web based IRC networks who do not block tor as policy? |
| dr|z3d | Not afaik, figaro, no. |
| dr|z3d | If there's a list out there, likely google knows it. |
| dr|z3d | See ya! |
| dr|z3d | (Don't rush back) |
| ln5 | looks like one of my relays got thrown out of the consensus at midnight (GMT). the tor process seems happy enough. anybody else seeing the same? |
| arma | a couple of people have been reporting something similar lately |
| arma | no clue what it might be. |
| arma | my first guess is that it tried to publish a new descriptor, but it didn't get the descriptor to enough authorities, so not enough people voted Running |
| ln5 | arma: hmm, anything i can do in helping debugging it? |
| arma | nickname? |
| ln5 | maatuska |
| arma | yep. i see four votes for it |
| arma | only three of them vote Running |
| arma | (ides doesn't like you) |
| arma | i think my diagnosis is right |
| arma | we screwed up the network by ditching the v2 directory system too early |
| arma | i have a patch in my git, but it doesn't quite work right |
| arma | "restart your relay" is my only suggestion for now. |
| arma | or wait 16 hours and it'll publish again |
| ln5 | it's been restarted, we'll see what happens |
| ln5 | thanks |
| ln5 | why would ides not like it btw? |
| arma | no idea |
| katmagic | http://arxiv.org/abs/1004.1267v1 |
| TJ | how and where can i have 0.9.8n? |
| TJ | openssl |
| katmagic | http://openssl.org/source/openssl-0.9.8n.tar.gz |
| TJ | is there an rpm ready for this? im a noob |
| katmagic | (1.0.0 is the latest stable version, though.) |
| katmagic | http://www.openssl.org/support/faq.html#MISC4 |
| katmagic | I'd suggest searching for OpenSSLl in your package manager or compiling it from source. (It's quite easy, though you won't get automatic upgrades.) |
| TJ | the thing is disto dont have that version and im particularly need it to have my node work |
| Runa | TJ: what if you downgrade? (not very pretty, but it might be a solution) |
| TJ | i did for several times. here's the thing downgrade or upgrade it works initially but as soon as i restart tor. it goes back to the same problem |
| katmagic | Does Tor require 0.9.8n? |
| TJ | i wondering if those centos nodes owners have no problem after retarting :( |
| TJ | someone claimed that 0.9.8n fixed his problem so im freaking find a way to have that but it'snot included in my distro update ( |
| katmagic | Tor builds just fine without it. |
| katmagic | http://www.linuxquestions.org/linux/answers/Applications_GUI_Multimedia/Compiling_Programs_from_Source |
| katmagic | Use the link I provided before and that if you really feel you need the new version. |
| katmagic | (Actually, you should probably use 1.0.0.) |
| TJ | so i have to compile to have such version? |
| katmagic | As far as I know, no pre-made RPMs of 1.0.0 exist. If you can find one, cool. If not, then you either need to get someone to make an RPM for you or compile it yourself. |
| katmagic | It's really just three commands. `./configure; make; sudo make install`. |
| katmagic | Or `./configure; make; su` then `make install`, depending on whether or not your distribution uses sudo. |
| TJ | oh.ok.i will try it now |
| katmagic | (Yes, it is supposed to make that big mess on your screen.) |
| katmagic | I'm not sure how well this will coexist with your vendor-supplied version, though. |
| katmagic | You may have to compile Tor relinked with the new location, too. |
| katmagic | You should ask someone who knows about Red Hat. |
| katmagic | (I don't think this is going to help, either.) |
| Dragon_Eros | hello |
| katmagic | Hi. |
| Dragon_Eros | how do I connect to a TOR version of Firefox? |
| katmagic | You can access the Internet over Tor with Firefox by using TorButton, which should be included in the Tor Browser Bundle or can be found at https://www.torproject.org/torbutton/ . |
| Dragon_Eros | I d/l the Vadalia bundle....I do not see a "Tor Button" |
| katmagic | Did you restart Firefox? |
| Dragon_Eros | I am on the tor button page now...........gimme a sec plz |
| Dragon_Eros | does it matter if I install from tor sire or mozella site? |
| katmagic | Yes. Apparently the version at addons.mozilla.org will no longer automatically update. |
| Dragon_Eros | see..........I always thought that when I started Tor it would open a new Firefox browser.....but it never does |
| katmagic | No. You toggle TorButton to switch the browser. |
| katmagic | (The rationale for discontinuing auto-updates is at https://blog.torproject.org/blog/torbutton-release-125-google-captchas-and-addonsmozillaorg .) |
| Dragon_Eros | it says it can not instal |
| katmagic | Why? |
| Dragon_Eros | Invalid file hash |
| katmagic | *Very* interesting. Do you mind if I ask who your ISP is? |
| Dragon_Eros | I am on a SSL Server |
| Dragon_Eros | I think |
| Dragon_Eros | everything to and from My PC is run through a tunnel |
| katmagic | You restarted Firefox after installing the bundle, right? |
| Dragon_Eros | yes..........I installed the bundle months ago |
| katmagic | It looks like TorButton goes over clear text even if you're accessing the HTTPS version of the web site. |
| katmagic | So your ISP would be able to tamper with the file. |
| katmagic | (Though obviously not allow it to install.) |
| Dragon_Eros | Embarq is My servrer |
| katmagic | And you don't have a 'Tor Disabled' button on the right side of your Firefox status bar? |
| Dragon_Eros | yes |
| Dragon_Eros | but the onion is green |
| Dragon_Eros | it says tor is disabled |
| katmagic | Click on it. |
| Dragon_Eros | just switched tgo "tor enabled" |
| katmagic | (The Vidalia icon means that the Tor daemon is running; the 'Tor Enabled' means that Firefox is using Tor.) |
| Dragon_Eros | but............ |
Popular searches: