| Cobblestone | yeah, let me get an isolated link for you with the examples I"ve seen that are still doing it. |
| Petein | riven: i must not change the css |
| riven | Petein: then you must be out of luck. |
| Cobblestone | LOL Petein |
| Cobblestone | can't you back up the one that's there and use one that you are working on for testing purposes Petein ? |
| Petein | riven: wait ill paste it somewhere. the css file |
| riven | Petein: no need |
| Petein | riven: here http://codepad.org/uWLTpC5N |
| Action: riven shrugs |
| Petein | riven: so there isnt anything special. how can i add this for the table? |
| riven | Petein: again, if you can't touch the css, you're out of luck. |
| Petein | Cobblestone: i can but i dont know how to change the css for this purpose |
| Cobblestone | Petein: you're not giving any room for help, tell riven what he wants to hear and get dirty with your css. |
| Cobblestone | Even most CMS's let you touch the CMS, this is where your trouble is. |
| Cobblestone | *touch the CSS |
| Action: Cobblestone hahahah |
| Petein | Cobblestone: im not using a CMS |
| lectrick | hi there. How do I do the thing where the text field has a grey suggestion in it as to what goes inside, until focus goes to it? |
| Petein | river dude can you tell me how can i keep the css for my table there? |
| Cobblestone | Petein: You're going to have to mess with the CSS to get help with it. This is all I"m going to say about this. |
| riven | lectrick: JS. HTML5 standardizes that with the "placeholder" attribute, but currently only Opera (I believe) supports that. |
| Petein | Cobblestone: why you dont tell me how? |
| riven | lectrick: also note that you cannot ever use that as a replacement for an actual <label>! |
| Cobblestone | because riven is the dude on right now that remotely knows what you want. Honestly just take a couple of steps back and reintroduce yourself as someone who can edit their css. My knowledge is limited and lacks what you probably actually need. IMO you need to crack open a css book because unless you're using a spread sheet I don't know why you would want to control your CSS with tables. |
| Cobblestone | that was to Petein |
| Petein | Cobblestone: i want to keep the same styling for the text inside the table |
| sm | g'day all |
| riven | ello |
| Cobblestone | and why aren't you using divs? |
| Petein | Cobblestone: ok i put a div amd the table is inside that div. now what |
| Cobblestone | :-) this isn't a css class this is a css help class, you need to re read whatever it is you looked at |
| Cobblestone | *help being the key word |
| Petein | Cobblestone: firebug shows that the table keeps the above CSS styling. but its not.why? |
| Cobblestone | I mean let me ask you this, do you know the purpose of using the div instead of a table? |
| lectrick | riven hear you on the "label" thing, kind of disappointed in only-Opera support with the standard |
| riven | ]secret @ Petein |
| _ZofBot4 | Petein, secret: No URL = no help. We are not telepaths, and can't determine the problem (let alone the solution) without playing with the troublesome page. So, give URL, or leave the channel and call 1-900-PSYCHIC. Oh, and good luck. You'll need it. |
| riven | lectrick: err, HTML5 isn't a standard yet :p |
| riven | well, a draft. |
| Petein | riven: http://techmanthan.wordpress.com/2007/12/26/why-not/ |
| Petein | riven: div seems more difficult though to use |
| Cobblestone | Petein: really? even I wasn't this lost when I came on here the first time. at least I had something to make fun of :-) |
| Petein | Cobblestone: i believe that im more experienced in C/Java/Python than you are |
| Cobblestone | Then CSS should be a breeze ! |
| Petein | Cobblestone: i dont like CSS. i was forced to do something |
| Cobblestone | what are you stuck in the early 90's? |
| nemo | riven, lectrick |
| nemo | tested placeholder, works in FF3.7 at least |
| riven | neat |
| preaction | then this is the wrong place to ask for help, you're looking to hire someone to do things for you, go to #css-lance or rentacoder.com |
| nemo | (which I'm using as default browser these days) |
| Action: nemo fires up FF3.6 |
| nemo | http://m8y.org/tmp/testcase154.xhtml |
|
|
| nemo | not in FF3.6 |
| nemo | not in Opera 10 either |
| nemo | so I guess if you mean opera, you mean 10.5 alpha |
| riven | nope |
| riven | seems I was wrong there |
| nemo | works in Chrome nightlies |
| monokrome | What is that supposed to do? |
| nemo | and webkit nightlies |
| riven | I figured Opera did since they also support most of the other form enhancements. |
| nemo | and Safari 4 |
| nemo | riven: doesn't work in Opera 10.5 either |
| nemo | sooo |
| monokrome | ooh. The placeholder attribute |
| Petein | Cobblestone: dude... come on... show me how |
| nemo | FF3.7, Safari, Chrome |
| Cobblestone | No! hahhaha! are you kidding me? |
| nemo | well. admittedly my opera 10.5 build is a bit old |
| riven | I have the latest and it doesn't work |
| dehuman | <Petein> riven: div seems more difficult though to use <-- lolwut? |
| oksushi | nemo: looks cool in webkit nightly |
| nemo | oksushi: huh. really? |
| nemo | looked same in chrome nightly as FF3.7 |
| oksushi | the 'placeholder' in the input? |
| Action: nemo fires up webkit nightly |
| nemo | looks same in webkit nightly too |
| nemo | oksushi: dunno. looks pretty standard :) |
| nemo | I wonder if browsers have style hooks... |
| Action: nemo examines it in firebug |
| nemo | nothing obvious in DOM or default styles... |
| Cobblestone | so riven, I'm here:http://www.brunildo.org/test/Overflowxy2.html and I can still scroll all around when the box is an overflow-foo hidden |
| Action: riven shrugs |
| riven | I belive you... |
| riven | believe* |
| Cobblestone | is it just not completely supported? I get the effect I want when it's just overflow |
| dehuman | i wish i wasnt so ugly |
| dehuman | sigh |
| oksushi | nemo: input.red::-webkit-input-placeholder {color: red;} |
| dehuman | oh well, at least i have a hot girlfriend |
| nemo | oksushi: hm. that suggests an intuitive firefox name :) |
| riven | Cobblestone: I already asked this, but... have you checked the various browsers' bug trackers? |
| Cobblestone | no I haven't I guess I should. |
| riven | dehuman: show tits or gtfo. [obligatory repsonse] |
| riven | response* |
| nemo | oksushi: nope. not -moz-input-placeholder... |
| oksushi | dang |
| nemo | oksushi: heh. I wonder if you can use background-image etc |
| nemo | and gradients |
| dehuman | riven: dont have tits handy :( |
| oksushi | nemo: or blink ;) |
| nemo | lol |
| riven | nemo: when a pseudo-selector makes it into CSS, it will certainly be restricted, like :first-line etc. |
| nemo | oksushi: somehow I suspect some parts of CSS3 will never be implemented |
| nemo | like marquee module |
| riven | probably will only allow text-level styling. |
| sm | speaking of gradients. I can't see a robust way to fix the background gradient at http://newarch.archaeology.ucla.edu/programs/ (the ugly gray to white transition at the bottom). Is there one ? |
| sm | ok.. as usual, asking has stimulated a few ideas.. |
| nemo | oksushi: I love this CSS feature - good for degrading gracefully for non-JS browsers, something my sites need to do anyway |
| Cobblestone | give it a real footer and take away the gradient entirely |
| nemo | and harmless for non-supporting browsers |
| nemo | s/CSS/HTML5/ |
| nemo | oksushi: BTW, one thing that pisses me off about those autosuggest as implemented right now, if you have no JS, you get that annoying text to erase. so few do it properly |
| Cobblestone | sm: I would also try getting more of your content above the fold too |
| nemo | oksushi: but w/ placeholder= you could fetch the placeholder attribute that IE will probably preserve, and use it to do a show/hide hook |
| Cobblestone | you've got room |
| nemo | hmmm |
| nemo | of course, now I have to figure out how to skip the JS for non-IE browsers :) |
| nemo | meh. I think I'll just put it in for supporting browsers, the inputs didn't have text before anyway |
| nemo | s/non-IE/supporting/ |
| oksushi | nemo: sorry, was making coffee. But I agree :) |
| nemo | oksushi: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457801 |
| sm | thanks |
| Cobblestone | sm, just like you have a solid blue title with little bits of lighting, do the same thing below |
| Cobblestone | but think of the footer as further from the light and color that as so. I can see you want a light source on most your objects. |
| Cobblestone | so many bugs riven :-P |
| Raptelan | does :hover work on any element, such as a span? |
| preaction | yes, but not in IE6 |
| Raptelan | ok, that's okay with me. |
| Cobblestone | if anyone is still using ie6 after the google hack I'd be surprised |
| Cobblestone | riven I can only find IE bugs would someone consider this a bug? |
| riven | If it's considered a bug in IE8, then yes. :) |
| Cobblestone | I mean if you rely on scroll bars then the issue isn't one, but if you have a trackpad or scrollwheel it'll give issues.... and the ie bugs aren't specific to this instance. |
| Cobblestone | The instance being that overflow-y hidden just takes away the scroll bar but doesn't eliminate the scroll feature for scroll wheels and trackpads. |
| riven | Cobblestone: why don't you go and ask in webkit's or mozilla's irc channel? |
| Cobblestone | I was making sure it wasn't a css thing first |
| Cobblestone | like, that's just how it is, there's no real fix, sort of thing. |
| riven | I honestly don't know. It'd say it's a bug, but who knows. |
| riven | Better to ask a webkit or mozilla dev :) |
| zamabe | Cobblestone, are you applying it to html or body? |
| Cobblestone | html |
| Cobblestone | never thought of putting it in body, I'll search for a moz channel riven |
| Cobblestone | unless you know of one.. |
| Cobblestone | zamabe: you know my issue? |
| riven | Cobblestone: irc.mozilla.org/developers |
| Cobblestone | solving this will fix a different bug in chromium |
| Cobblestone | thanks riven ! |
| zamabe | no but i know that typically all browsers won't let you permanentely hide the contents of html or body like that =/ |
| Cobblestone | well overflow hidden works like I want it to |
| riven | zamabe: sure they do. |
| zamabe | riven: display:none; is all |
| riven | zamabe: uh, no. |
| riven | what Cobblestone said. |
| zamabe | ORLY, click your scrollwheel and you'll see a round movement thing come up that lets you see the rest of the page |
| zamabe | i haven't seen it do it with divs though |
| zamabe | probably because the scroll only affects the document |
| elb0w | I can put classes on td's right? |
| dgs | elb0w: yes |
| Cobblestone | even if I put everything in a containing div to get the overflow effect I want, it still would act the same par example of the link I gave. |
| elb0w | k silly question |
| elb0w | i know |
| elb0w | :P |
| Cobblestone | I don't know if I know what you're saying zamabe :-) |
| Cobblestone | that irc link isn't working for me riven I'll search for it. |
| zamabe[cell] | Erm, I know its not usually recommended and I'm not even sure it will work, but try putting a wrapper div inside body and applying the overflow y to it |
| Cobblestone | link zamabe |
| Cobblestone | ? |
| zamabe[cell] | What |
| zamabe[cell] | Hell no I'm not making a testcase on a cellphone |
| Cobblestone | sorry I didin't read it carefully enough |
| Cobblestone | I just said that doesn't work though |
| Cobblestone | are you talking about pseudo classes for the body zamabe ? |
| zamabe[cell] | No, I gave you directions to try |
| Raptelan | Cobblestone: what google hack? |
| Cobblestone | right, even if I put it all in a contained div, that div will still scroll if someone has a trackpad or scrollwheel |
| Cobblestone | I'm looking for the article Raptelan |
| Cobblestone | Raptelan: http://gizmodo.com/5475612/chinese-hack-tracked-back-to-two-universities-and-an-ie-exploit |
| Cobblestone | google subsequently wants to (has?) banned China from accessing it's server. |
| zamabe[cell] | Actually they did the opposite |
| Cobblestone | They made china their server? |
| zamabe[cell] | AFAIK Google uncensored in China |
| zamabe[cell] | China's "great firewall" prob didn't like that |
| Raptelan | Cobblestone: they want to ban china because they were running IE 6 and got bit. Well that's just stupid. |
| Raptelan | IE has had tons and tons of exploits over time. |
| Raptelan | this is nothing new. |
| Cobblestone | I still don't understand why companies IT can't go and update the browswers |
| Raptelan | Cobblestone: where I work, there is corporate policy that forbids running anything newer than IE6. |
| Cobblestone | *company's IT department |
| zamabe[cell] | Raptelan: what are you saying? |
| Raptelan | Cobblestone: but we violate policy at our location, and run Firefox and update IE to 8 :P |
| Cobblestone | how do you deal with the possibility of being exploited like google? |
| Cobblestone | oh |
| Cobblestone | hahah |
| zamabe[cell] | Cobblestone: money |
| Cobblestone | what's the money? |
| Cobblestone | their software ? |
| Raptelan | Cobblestone: well, the corporate policy is to yell at users not to open links in mail, apply security updates maybe, etc. |
| Cobblestone | you don't think google had this as well? |
| jedimind | updating several thousand computers at once and making sure that the multi-million dollar in-house intranet that they've had for 10 years still works |
Popular searches: